Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricco Diack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify‎. ✗plicit 14:44, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ricco Diack

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT. Coverage is limited to routine game coverage, team-affiliated sources, and sports databases; there are no examples of independent WP:SIGCOV of this individual player. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Scotland. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:51, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have added further sources, including an independent article which largely focuses on the subject, Ricco Diack. Additionally, this is a player that I am confident further material will be published on in the coming season. Partickthistle123 (talk)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 17:57, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Herald source is decent, but not enough on its own. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify – Per WP:TOOSOON. Could become notable in the medium term. Svartner (talk) 22:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As nominator I would support draftification provided @Partickthistle123 does. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I’m fine with draftification, I will continue to update the page in draft form and add independent sources as they are published. Hopefully the page will become improved to the extent it can be fully restored. Partickthistle123 (talk) 11:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify as nominator. Dclemens1971 (talk) 11:37, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.